Instructions For Dominoes Chicken

tragedy was consummated: Galicia have second

is because the Ministry of Development yesterday unveiled order form official (live transparency because José Blanco known this before the summer) the AVE Santiago - Ourense Costruire in Iberian gauge:

The interior AVE Galician is the only Iberian gauge to output ports

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/27/0003_8875192.htm

"The director general of Railway Infrastructure, Carlos María Juárez Cole, said yesterday that the entire internal network high will speed service in late 2011 from Ourense, Santiago and A Coruña is in Iberian gauge, in order to not choke out of goods by rail from the Galician ports and ensure interoperability with the Portuguese path. "

And above these inept attempt to convince us it's for our good, that having pudding Galician ports output.

BUT is that no one realizes this BIG LIE?

Mounting the Santiago-Ourense UIC gauge, with two wide bodies changers stations Ourense and Santiago ... NOT AFFECTED AT ALL GOODS
!!!!!
goods from the ports of La Coruña and Ferrol can still coming out Betanzos-Lugo-Monforte, and the ports of Vilagarcía, Marin and Vigo can follow out by the Atlantic Axis (W Iberian) to Guillarei and then go to Ourense.

PUSSY THEN WHAT WE ARE EXPECTING THIS BUILDING?

"This is an interim measure" common sense ", according to experts consulted, that conjures up the Kafkaesque possibility that port goods are stranded in a no man's land rail."

LIE!

The goods do not remain isolated as outlined above.

LIE!

is not a temporary measure, as they have no fucking idea what they're doing in the future. And, moreover, en el 2016 no habrá NI UN PUTO EURO EN LAS ARCAS ESPAÑOLAS para acometer obras innecesarias como UN CAMBIO DE ANCHO que es MUCHO MÁS COSTOSO QUE ACOMETER CAMBIADORES DE ANCHO y de cuya operación NO HAY NINGUNA EXPERIENCIA PREVIA EN ESPAÑA.

"(...) es preciso mirar hacia atrás para recordar que la nefasta planificación dio lugar a un eje atlántico deficitario, convirtiéndose en la única línea de alta velocidad que no se planteó en paralelo a la convencional con el objetivo de destinar a otros usos la vía antigua (cercanías o mercancías)"

Doble pregunta para el Ministro de Fomento ¿Por qué ha ocurrido esto (la nefasta planificación)? What will you do then the Ministry of Development to compensate for the brutal Galicia planning? "(...)

responsible for planning the rail of Development, at a conference on the future of rail organized yesterday by the Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos de Galicia, wanted to fight against technical axiom that relates high-speed international track width, slightly narrower than that used in Spain and Portugal. "High speed is not necessarily synonymous with international gauge," he said, it is characterized, among other factors, for the wide radius of curve allow more competitive rates. "

Totally agree. The high speed is more characterized by the radii of curvature. See if this Development is responsible noses to tell us the radii used in Galicia in comparison with the rest of Spain.

And a clarification: in Iberian gauge, to date, RENFE rolling stock only reaches 250 km / h. Are we going at this rate the Galicia to Madrid? Galicia Is the only region not connected to 350 km / h?

"The aim of this decision" temporary ", he said, is the connection of the Galician ports with the new rail freight network in the coming years, driven Development. And Incidentally, avoid installing in Santiago and Ourense wide two separate exchangers. The goal of late 2011 Ourense and A Coruña are a little over 50 minutes, the process of changing the width to the axes of the trains would add 10 minutes more to this record. "

Again LIE! !

Galician ports to connect to install NO Iberian gauge between Santiago and Ourense.

LIE!

is not provisional. If so, have dates set for the width change with the specific solution that vain to give him the goods then.

LIE!

The ONLY purpose is to avoid installing two changers wide. Does not say the Ministry of Development, is to mount the changer is much cheaper then tackle the gauge changing the whole line.

The question is why are installed elsewhere changers wide (with the commissioning of the AVE to Valencia and Albacete Valencia Alicante and Castellón benefit, even though they already have in 2-3 years AVE) and Galicia. Why?

LIE! Today

not take 10 minutes changers wide, especially if one considers that this operation would take place at the entrance to the stations. And we are hiding a great truth HOW LONG GALLEGOS LOST WHEN PERFORMING THE OPERATION OF CHANGE OF WIDE?

the Ministry of Development also seems to make policy rather than infrastructure. Let's see if they find in Promoting the objective is not join Coruña and Ourense in 50 minutes. THE GOAL IS TO HAVE A BIRD OF QUALITY WITH A Coruña and Vigo MADRID IN LESS THAN 3 HOURS.

"Of course, all the accumulated bad decisions over the years become the Galician community in the only province with a high-speed network Iberian gauge"

And nobody resigns?

"In another vein, the government delegate in Galicia, Antón Louro highlighted in the technical conference held yesterday in Santiago in Galicia Works has executed 5,600 million euros in the period 2004-2009 "

interesting data that contradicts some of my assumptions expressed in http://infraestructurasgalicia.blogspot.com/ 2010/09/blanco-no-concreta-la-inversion-en-las.html . There, commented that since the State had carried 86,000 million in infrastructure between 2004 and 2009, he coresponderían Galicia (6% of population) 5,160 million. Now, by rote, we say that in Galicia were run 5,600 million (6.5%), but it remained unclear how many millions from European funds and no details, year by year real investment.

also interesting contribution should be no criticism of the dean of civil engineers:

"The dean of the College of Civil Engineering, Carlos Nardiz, highlighted the role of English engineers in the work" more important in the history de Galicia "which, in its view, vertebrate community" from the standpoint of public transport "."

If the College of Civil Engineering not raise a critical voice who is going to do? Do the delegates of the construction companies were present in need of an award to improve its battered accounts? Do charge of the engineering studies are still in a worse economic situation that construction companies? NO ONE DARES TO TELL THE KING TO BE NAKED!

At least it seems that the Xunta de Galicia empienzan Cosco something and have realized the absurdity of having a high-speed Atlantic Axis (even medium speed) with no connection to the airport in Santiago:

The Xunta endorsed the plan to connect rail Lavacolla

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/27/0003_8874551.htm

"This study, as stated the Regional Minister, be delivered to the Ministry of Development, implying that the final decision to connect both transport department will be led by José Blanco. "

SUMMARIZING:

José Blanco, Lugo Minister of Works, when he leaves office will be remembered not only for failing to pay the AVE Galician (because it will leave the Galicians to pay for 25 years, if that which is falling get out of contracts) but also for leaving us ISOLATED of Spain with Iberian gauge network.

PORCE TRAGEDY!

Dell Isnpiron 1525 Sd Card Drives

AVE Present and future of the railways in Galicia

Sounds great right?

This is a conference organized by the College of Engineers, Canales y Puertos de Galicia (with the invaluable collaboration of the Ministry of Development) for " raise awareness of the status of projects and works in conjunction with high-speed railway being made in Galicia and on the other, which will involve the integration of rail for the urban system and public transport Galicia. "

The complete program and registration (stakeholders still have time to date) are available on 20ferrocaril http://www.ciccp.es/ImgWeb/Galicia/Home/jornadas% 20of% (7). Pdf

is because the contents of the papers is very interesting.

So, the day on Friday 26 November, the inaugural conference "Contribution rail infrastructure to improve regional transportation " certainly discuss regional transportation Galicia, the most profitable regional line of Spain (La Coruña -Vigo) living with the most third world (2 hour drive and 2 services daily on the Coruña-Lugo). And, of course, will explain why in Galicia does not develop a network of neighborhood and in other communities.

the same day, probably the ADIF explained in " projects access lines Galicia "(Or Dec. 3 at " Access to high speed Galicia) what were the design parameters (minimum radius) compared to the approaches to Catalonia and Valencia. Just comparing these minimum radii know if access to Galicia is the "same quality" as the rest of English hits. I hope also that ADIF Galicia argue why you do not need to build a by-pass in Zamora so you can save 20 minutes away. Finally, it will be interesting to see if this conference is in favor of building the Santiago-Ourense AVE Iberian gauge (unacceptable my humble point of view, leaving Galicia in the past).

3 conference in December, I hope the Railway Infrastructure Directorate explain to speak of " projects lines Atlantic Axis" why only going to Galicia on the coast have 2-way width UIC (although it is now built in Iberian Development Minister José Blanco said the change will take place at UIC), while the Mediterranean Corridor has 2-way + 2-way Iberian UIC. It will also be important to analyze how the Galician ports conecctar think once you switch to UIC the Atlantic Axis.

And, doubt, hope that the December 10 close in ADIF "The entrances to the cities of Galicia" why they are doing underground rail corridors throughout Spain except in Galicia (except Vigo, although we had to fight it much). ADIF will be interesting that we explain the burial of León, Palencia, Santander, Logroño, Vitoria, Almería, Granada, Girona, Alicante, Bilbao, Hospitalet, Lorca, Valladolid, Antequera, Algeciras, Murcia, Cartagena, Illescas ... not to mention the billionaires in Barcelona, \u200b\u200bMalaga and Valencia and from which they once (Cordoba and Seville).

I said, I hope that these days give us an explanation from the Galician what we AVE. I hope in the College of Civil Engineering has place for analysis, reflection and criticism. I hope that the College of Civil Engineers claim the same quality of stroke than in other regions. And I hope the Galician press setting out the conclusions of these conferences, as well as advertised ( http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/25/0003_8870593.htm )

Thank You For Sharing This Special Day To Us

final Battle of 6,000 million tranche AVE

We entered the stretch of the year and the Ministry of Public Works plays in Galicia.

"ACS, Ferrovial, Acciona and FCC wants to team up in the largest English concession"

http://www.cincodias.com/articulo/empresas/ACS-Ferrovial-Acciona-FCC-quieren-aliarse-mayor -concesion-espanola/20101111cdscdiemp_1/cdsemp /

"The construction industry buzzing about the imminent bidding for a historic concession, both in their numbers as being the first wide-ranging in the railway field. This is the section of AVE-Lubián Olmedo-Orense, valued at 6,000 million. Various sources claim that ACS, FCC, Acciona, Ferrovial has offered to bid together in order to add capacity to lift 1,350 million in loans and provide 600 million in equity. Meanwhile, its rival medium pressure Promotion to split the contract. "

Go! Have to contribute 600 million from his pocket and ask for 1,350 million euros to the bank ... With the times seems a little risky gamble Galicia essential communications in this way is not it?

"deck in the industry that half of those 6,000 million budget would be provided by the State, the Bank put on the table 1,050 million, the 600 million awarded withstand its own resources and seek other 1,350 million in credits commercial banks. A business still shape on a sheet. Therefore it will take a final decision. "

The famous statement ... Do you have already closed in Development?

"This problem is linking the bank financing. Close associate of Minister interacted White with commercial banks to support this action. And is that the drying up of credit could still dealing with this historic project. "

If 10 years ago Pepe Blanco took his briefcase and, province by province, was convincing the delegates to elect ZP PSOE (which you got it), then do not hesitate now scroll halfway around the world successfully, Mecado market, convincing the commercial banks: London, Berlin, New York ...

"Finance and Development discussed the statement, but everything indicates this historic competition will come this year. Long ago, the concessions were the largest volume radial and first generation highways. Experiences that have ended in bitter pill for the concessionaires. "

We see that there are several keys in this macrolicitación:

1) We must put a lot of money from their own resources. Not all companies have the money.

2) You have to convince banks to put a lot of money. Not all companies have sufficient credit in the market to give them money. There are not many banks with opportunities to give such credit.

3) The tender specifications and requirements is key when not compute as a deficit and does not drag the battered accounts of the English economy. The Finance Ministry is still reviewing the tender documents (is that not convinced?)

4) The recent experience of PPP (Public Private Participation) left large frog, there are concessions for radio and highways first generation

And considering all this ...

AGREES TO STOP ALL "AVE GALICIA TO ACCESS THE FATE OF AN AWARD OF THIS TYPE? Galician

All we wish him the Minister of Public Works, because their fate is ours, and if it goes wrong, Galicia will NEVER AVE (nor will there be no money in the General State Budget). All

this, but otherwise, I had a few days ago the press Galician:

Development Finance expects to give the green light AVE macrocontrato

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/ 11/06/0003_8831968.htm

"While the Treasury controls all state procurement, the review of draft Special Infrastructure Plan (IEP) which is part of the public-private partnership is being done with greater department intervention Elena Salgado, because it is a formula for hiring new and is necessary to analyze the future impact on the Budget. "

Seeking investors abroad is an added boost to the project

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/06/0003_8831970.htm

" The announcement by the Minister of Development, Joseph White, who will meet with representatives of U.S. mutual funds and Chinese to explain the project Special Infrastructure Plan (IEP) might give the impression that the funding of contracts such as the Galician AVE is not fully assured. "

"Development Ministry sources, however, Conversely interpret this contact with foreign investment groups. To begin with, were the executives of several funds that were interested in the plan of public-private partnership after its approval in April this year. "

Yes, yes. The funding is assured, but if perhaps going to China and New York (to promise substantial benefits, even if it is given over the escalation of the risk premium English).

In any case, pending the Treasury approved the statements and that investors find Pepe Blanco , Public Works approve projects meet basic

Approval the record of Public Information and Hearing and definitive "Blueprint North-Northeast Corridor High Velocidad.Línea high-speed Madrid-Galicia. Tranche Lubián-Ourense.Subtramos Lubián-Vilavella, Vilavella-Vilariño, Vilariño-Cerdedelo yCerdedelo- Porto. Platform

http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/11/12/pdfs/BOE-B-2010-38555.pdf

Further information on http: / / www.fomento.es/NR/rdonlyres/34548363-7A2B-48E3-8A36-8B08957F0A86/95599/10111201.pdf

And yet the Minister takes chest

The minister reiterated that the AVE from Ourense James and A Coruña circulated in late 2011

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/06/0003_8831971.htm

"So Joseph White summarized his commitment yesterday to the late Next year AVE can circulate between A Coruña, Santiago and Ourense. "

The Minister of Development, informationally transparent speaking again, telling us that in 2011 the Galician AVE circulate between Coruña and Santiago. BUT

not tell us what we're going to move into WIDTH IBERIAN and trains up to 250 KM / H. Let's see if some clever PROMOTION comes and convinces us that this is AVE.

Where there has been TRANSPARENT Development Minister José Blanco has been a socialist party to the Covenant which Obradoiro signed with the President of the Xunta Feijoo said "He put his signature and I put the pasta" .

And I say that has been transparent because it has been very clear that Pepe Blanco is believed to own the pulp of the Ministry of Development. Go nerve, to come to Galicia boasting rich kid. Both assumed that even mocked the (absurd) Feijóo promise to the AVE-Ourense Lugo: "Let him do and I start paying in 2015."
(both statements are http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/08/0003_8835544.htm )

NO Cucumber. Who has 6 years in Galicia promising things that are not met you. And if someone starts to pay in 2015 will be all the English, not you. More respect for Galicia. To see if the next time you come by train Galicia you do: you'll be the ass that you'll take away the urge to redo Conas with our infrastructure.

Otherway these weeks we have more news as the airport expansion Alvedro:

Development calls for tenders to extend the track Alvedro

http://www.fomento.es/ NR/rdonlyres/0EB550EE-D385-479D-995A-6347DBA0D436/95550/10111102.pdf

"The estimated cost of works to be about 120 million euros."

How? "120 million works?

"The tender budget of these works is 82 million euros (VAT included). Including the estimated cost of expropriation and other actions, the total investment about 120 million euros."

Ahhhhhh, thank goodness that the note clarifies Development (mdespués to mislead the header) that the works cost 82 million (not 120 which is the total investment). Now that's transparency!

will, because I go talking about the new terminal Coruña and the draft PGE2011 what is coming is a game of 1.7 million to draft the project, but with ZERO euros for 2011.

For those who want to know the execution time of the works, saying that stretches to 36 months, ie 3 years (see tender http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/ 11/11/pdfs/BOE-B-2010-38402.pdf )

Being ill: the Ministry of Development said that it was able to run the AVE Lubián-Ourense in just 3 years, but is not able to run an extension of 400 meters of runway of an airport in less than 3 years. Curious is not it?

There was also good news for the airport of Vigo:

José Blanco attended the ceremony to inaugurate the construction of the new airport terminal Peinador (Vigo)

http://www.fomento.es/NR/rdonlyres/DCEEB47C-383F-436C-8E8F -32C29304C839/77918/10101102.pdf

"The Development Ministry will allocate more than 100 million euros for expansion and renovation works of the airport"

"The Ministry allocated 47.6 million euros to construction of the terminal building. In total, including parking, new office complex and other actions, the Government of Spain's investment in the expansion and remodeling Peinador amount to more than 100 million euros. "

The same play with the investment data ...

To finish and changing back to railway tracks, it seems that the Xunta de Galicia is tired of doing panoli paying Renfe to maintain unprofitable lines. And I say making panoli because Galicia was one of the few regions who voted with their money that support:

La Xunta justify the withdrawal of subsidies by Renfe "xestión inefficient"

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia/2010/11/11/0003_8841890.htm

is clear that we must subsidize loss-making services if they meet a service of general interest. What can not be done is that the pay that subsidy Galicia Xunta (ie, Galician citizens) and another region pay the state (ie, all English, including, again, Galician).

right?

Homemade Toys To Jag Off Too

Olmedo-Orense Galicia "is 5, 2% of GDP? Development awards

encntrábamos is what we in the statements of Minister of Public Works summer José Blanco: "(...) Galicia represents 5.2% of GDP " http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/galicia / 2010/08/15/0003_8669571.htm )

And is that from the Government of Spain is we sell the Galician intentanto over and over again that we are only 5.2% of GDP. Especially at the Galician sell the state's investments in infrastructure, showing (well, rather telling) that theoretically are much higher than the 5.2%.

I say theoretically because the Government of Spain always obvious three fundamental aspects:

1) What we have to say to Galicia is the real investment ratio executed in the previous year, not next year forecast. Because we are tired of Galicia budget ever spent.

2) The investment data to be transmitted actually served to put into context Galician Overall we all know that not every year can invest money divided evenly between regions, as there are powerful investments have their cycles in which investment is required very powerful: the construction of the AVE to Barcelona for 5 years, Valencia AVE AVE now and Galicia in 2-3 years. Therefore, the Government of Spain should SHOW investment data actually implemented in a BIG CYCLE, such as the past 15 years. Only thus can examine whether the regional distribution of investments is fair and meets some criteria (eg GDP in which the Government is so determined or population, which would be fairer According to the English Constitution)

3) Finally, the Government of Spain must put all that information in context within the framework of European aid. The European Union gives Member States a series of funds to reduce regional differences. These funds (ERDF and COHESION mainly) must meet the additionality criteria so that additionally serve to equity of state to reduce the structural differences of the regions on the European Union average. That is, if the Government of Spain spends 8% in infrastructure in Galicia, but that 8% 6% are equity and 2% are EU funds, then the Government of Spain is not favoring Galicia. Would only be doing a fair share (6% by weight population) and would add the additional 2% of investment with the European funds that would accrue to Galicia (Galicia are). Thus the data must always reflect the real investment rate ajecutada corresponding to European funds.

taking into account only these 3 things is when we know the weight that is giving the Kingdom of Spain to Galicia in the regionalised distribution infrastructure investment.

But back to the beginning of the question "represents 5.2% of Galicia Spain? Should therefore be investment in infrastructure of the State in Galicia 5.2% of the total?

This argument has been consistently used in Catalonia in the wake of the new Statute of Autonomy. Well, not only used, but because it was shielded reflected investment in infrastructure in this region in terms of GDP.

This approach is, in my opinion, totally wrong and unfair.

unfair because the English Constitution SPANISH says all are equal, with equal rights, and that citizens can not be discriminated by their place of birth.

DISCRIMINATION Not to give more money to poorer regions RICH (higher GDP)? The non-discrimination and treat all citizens equally REQUIRES a distribution of investments in response to population weight.

even the least experienced in the art could understand that it is unfair that the more taxes you pay (for being richer) had preference in doctors' surgeries or in public health for the citizens poblres or should pay less tax.

Well on the issue of infrastructure is the same. Once removed

the fallacious argument that investments should be divided by GDP, consider if Galicia is really only 5.2% of GDP.

AND DEAL is made, we distributed it also ORO XXI century is none other than CO2 sinks.

What are we talking about? Taking

information provided ( http://unfccc.int/portal_espanol/essential_background/feeling_the_heat/items/3305.php ), we can summarize that:

"The limits of emissions of greenhouse gases set by the Kyoto Protocol is a way to assign monetary values \u200b\u200bto the Earth's atmosphere that we all share, something that had not been done before. "

" The Kyoto Protocol, once in force, establish a limit the total emission of major world economies, ie a fixed number of "emission units." Each of the industrialized countries have mandatory emission targets to be met ... but it is assumed that some will do better than expected, which is even below these limits, while others exceed. "

" The Protocol allows countries that can save some emission units, emissions that would be eligible but have not "used" - and sell this excess capacity to countries that exceed their goals. The so-called "market carbon-known by that name because carbon dioxide is the greenhouse gas most frequently produced, and because emissions of other greenhouse gases will be recorded and entered in the form of "carbon dioxide equivalent" - is both both flexible and realistic. Countries that fail to meet their commitments may "buy" compliance ... but the price may be high. The higher the cost, the more pressure they feel to use energy more efficiently and to investigate and promote the development of alternative energy sources with low or zero emissions. "

CLARITA" NO?

Countries like Spain, which are capable of reducing CO2 emissions will have to buy emission rights to countries that do not pollute.

But why Spain alike? Can not we spread the CO2 emission rights in Spain by autonomous community?

YES. DEAL OF CO2 BY REGIONS! Sure

Galicia, with its large forest cover and little industry could make a good profit by selling their emission rights, for example, Madrid, Basque Country and Catalonia. Sure

Galicia and bring more to the GDP of Spain ...

But how MUCH MONEY are talking?

In 2006, CCOO in Spain assessed the cost of buying allowances in the next 5 years to the tune of 3,500 million assuming a cost of 5 euros per ton (http : / / www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2006/04/19/ciencia/1145449800.html ).

In 2007, the Ministry of Environment encrypting an annual cost to Spain of 700 million euros per year until 2012 (the famous 3,500 million, I suppose that given the famous 5 euros per tonne), which would be borne by the State (60%) and industry (40%). ( http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Espana/redujo/puntos/emisiones/gases/efecto/invernadero/2006/elpepusoc/20070417elpepusoc_6/Tes )

But in 2008, the price of ton had already reached a whopping 12 euros ( http://www.lavanguardia.es/ciudadanos/noticias/20090508/53699537325/los-derechos-de-emision-de-co2-crean-un-mercado-abierto- a-investors-kyoto-ue-romeo-college-.html ) and comparing the emission rights market with gold or a barrel of oil.

And what is the current situation?

For the current price of a tonne is 15 euros (three times the estimate in 2006) and it is estimated that 2020 is set at between 20 and 40 euros ( http://www.cincodias.com/articulo/empresas/precio-CO2-duplica-alarma-empresas/20101104cdscdiemp_19/cdsemp/ ).

addition, Spain is the worst it has, as its failure to comply with Kyoto causes is the EU country have to pay more to buy allowances ( http://www.elmundo.es/mundodinero / 2010/10/12/economia/1286896924.html ). Well here's

Galicia, helping the richest regions do not have to pay so much for the CO2 emission rights. PROVIDING their forests. GIVING productive capacity-rich regions. WHAT GETS A CHANGE GALICIA? NOTHING.

If this important contribution is not counted in GDP, then divide the CO2 emission rights in Spain among the different autonomous regions and create a "market" national. The wealth that provides a region in the country is not only of money, there are more fundamental factors such as this, the CO2 emission rights, which are so important sinks of CO2 contributed by forests in regions such as Galicia.

And we have chosen the theme of the rights of CO2 because it is highly topical, the golden century. But we could have taken other data to measure the weight of Galicia in Spain, which is not restricted GDP.

Thus, Galicia in 2009 accounted for 10% of national exports. And not only that. While Spain has a trade deficit of more than 49,000 million euros, commercial superhábit Galicia was worth 800 million euros ( http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/10/27/galicia/1288183215.html ). THAT DO NOT COUNT WHEN MEASURING THE WEIGHT OF GALICIA IN SPAIN?

But there's more. Spain is a country in deficit in electric power (good bill charged the French). And Galicia? For Galicia, unlike Spain, exports to other regions, a quarter of what it produces ( http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/dinero/2010/07/15/0003_8611152.htm ). THAT DO NOT COUNT WHEN MEASURING THE WEIGHT OF GALICIA IN SPAIN? Because Galicia sacrificed their rivers (hydro), its mountains (wind farms) and air (power plants) for Spain to reduce its power deficit. Is not this as important as the GDP?

Make no mistake, here is not advocating the lack of solidarity with the rest of Galicia Spain. What you're trying to show is that Galicia is more than 5.2% of GDP in Spain. And, above all, Galicia is 6% of Spain in population weight, with the English Constirución in hand, is all that should prevail.